|| Print ||
|Tuesday, July 21, 2009|
Water – who has it, who wants it, who needs it – is an endless battle in Oregon. Skirmishes were fought in this past session, but a bigger battle looms.
A water bill that was passed by the 2009 Legislature awaits the governor’s signature, and two days ago it was reported that an irrigation districts group sees the bill as a "back door that could easily shut down winter withdrawals" from the Columbia River.
Among other things, HB 3369 establishes a lottery-backed fund for water projects and helps the Water Resources Department to keep working on a long-term water strategy. Proponent WaterWatch called it a landmark water policy bill that would protect fish and rivers, and for the first time places statute protections for peak and ecological water flows. Which is what has the irrigators worried. HB 3369 had a long, winding, interesting journey through the Legislature, including bipartisan leadership.
While all this might seem a bit insider-baseball to most readers, it isn't. Oregon is one of only two Western states without a strategic water management plan, and taking any step toward that is huge. It's huge if you are for such a plan, and huge if you are against it. And there are many factions on each side of the argument. If you live in the metro Portland area, where most of the state's population resides, and have rain falling on your head most of the year, you wonder: so what? Who needs to manage water in a state where there's so much of it? Well, there isn't unlimited water in this state, and it's going to become even more scarce as the population grows and the climate changes in the face of already-dwindling water availability for farms, fish and people.
In January, I wrote about an ambitious plan for water management called Headwaters to Ocean (H2O). It was a $100 million idea by the governor to take a comprehensive approach to addressing the state’s many serious water supply and quality issues, and create a comprehensive water plan. But the effort was squashed under the weight of a bad economy and warring factions. (Opponent Sen. Doug Whitsett, R-Klamath Falls, in a March newsletter said the plan “would create stringent new water regulations from the mountain tops to the ocean estuaries.”)
|A Complex Portrait: Immigration, Jobs and the Economy|
|Woman of Steel|
|Kill the Meeting|
|Debate surrounding Washington-Oregon I5 span heats up|
|Watchdog group takes issue with timber company's 'green' label|
|Labor dispute at the ports slowing Christmas deliveries|
|Fed stresses 'patience' regarding interest rate|
|Obama to announce end of Cuba isolation|
|Energy prices drop cost of living in US by most since 2008|
|Russia's attempt to slow ruble freefall fails|
Is your business ready to join us in the call for action? This opening panel includes Oregon businesses who will discuss why they signed the Oregon Climate Declaration, the investments they are making to reduce carbon emissions, and how their actions are affecting their companies.
Get ready for two days of special events produced with the EPA, Portland Timbers and ISOS before and after the GoGreen Conference on October 16.
How sports tourism is driving economic growth and making cities across Oregon a better place to live.
Port of Morrow's business-ready attitude has a surprising global impact.
Through its support of the arts, the Cultural Trust is strengthening the business community.
Heed the morals of these seminal holiday stories in your everyday life.
Amy will practice in the firm's Business, Real Estate, and Tax practice groups.
While the Bend City Council ultimately upheld the approval which enables OSU-Cascades to move forward with the 10 acre site, it did also thoughtfully consider the nature of its code requirements, resident concerns and OSU-Cascade’s efforts and suggestions and crafted conditions of approval to address potential impacts of the site in the area.