|| Print ||
|Tuesday, April 09, 2013|
BY SCOTT DAHLMAN | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Once again activists are trying to raise public fears about genetically engineered (GE) foods.
It’s hard to believe there’s anything more about GE foods to debate. In 2002, 70% of Oregon voters resoundingly rejected the idea of labeling foods containing GE ingredients. In the decade since, more and more farmers are choosing to grow biotech crops.
Last year 88% of the corn grown in the U.S. was genetically engineered, up from 34 percent of corn grown in 2002. More than 90% of all cotton, canola and soybeans grown in the U.S. also are biotech varieties.
Why are farmers planting biotech crops? Since they were first approved by federal agriculture and food safety regulators, experience globally has shown that GE crops have increased yields and broadly reduced negative impacts of farming on the environment.
Genetic engineering has been used to improve crop insect resistance, enhance crop herbicide tolerance and allow the use of more environmentally sustainable farming practices such as “low-till” or “no-till” farming.
But anti-GE zealots continue to claim plants improved using biotechnology somehow pose dangers, despite ever-mounting evidence to the contrary from scientists and food regulators around the world. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Health Organization, the National Research Council of the National Academies of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Medical Association and the American Dietetic Association have all concluded that biotech derived foods are as safe as their non-GE counterparts.
Last November, California voters defeated another labeling initiative like the defeated Oregon measure. Voters in both states spurned the labeling proposals because they were deceptive, confusing and costly. Editorials in all the major newspapers across California recommended a no vote.
The defeat of two labeling ballot measures 10 years apart hasn’t stopped GE opponents. In Washington State, anti-GE groups presented yet another labeling initiative to legislators earlier this year. And two labeling bills were introduced in the Oregon legislature.
In addition to labeling, some anti-GE groups are now seeking to ban the growing of biotech crops. A local initiative in Jackson County is one example.
Such crop bans arguably violate Oregon’s Right to Farm laws. In Oregon, farmers have the right to choose what crops and farm production technologies work best for them to produce products that meet the needs of markets they choose to serve. Local laws can’t interfere with those rights.
But activists argue that the growing of biotech crops is a risk to organic farmers. Despite such claims, no hard data shows any economic losses resulting from unintended presence of GE material in organic crops.
What farmers want is the right to decide for themselves how they farm and what they grow. The Oregon Board of Agriculture has outlined state policies to support the “wise management of all production systems on farmlands and agriculture applications, striving for economic viability, natural resource stewardship, good neighbor and employee relations, and community connections.”
The “good neighbor” advice in the board’s policy encourages cooperative coexistence among farmers. Coexistence is especially important given the diversity of production practices in agriculture today.
Coexistence is not a new idea. Farmers operate within communities and most already cooperate with neighbors toward their common success.
While talk of coexistence currently centers around GE and organic crops, biotech crops do not create any risks different from those posed by organic or conventional crops. The principles of coexistence and the need to preserve the integrity of crops apply to all agricultural production.
Oregon State University’s Agricultural Extension Service offers unique capabilities to help guide coexistence efforts for farmers in the state. Extension agents can help farmers and others in the food and feed production chain get the education they need about their respective roles in making coexistence work, particularly regarding stewardship, contracting and attention to gene flow.
The Willamette Valley Specialty Seed Association in one of the best examples of managed coexistence. A similar structure is under consideration in Southern Oregon – a better approach to organic producers concerns than banning GE crops.
Many Jackson County Farm Bureau members are discussing the best way to encourage coexistence among farmers in the Rogue Valley. Taking a page from Board of Agriculture, some Rogue Valley farmers have formed a loose coalition called the Good Neighbor Farmers.
Most in Oregon’s farming and food production industry share the view of Jackson County’s Good Neighbor Farmers. The right idea is collaboration, cooperation and coexistence.
Costly labeling laws and crop bans don’t make sense, aren’t good for consumers and would hurt Oregon farmers. Being good neighbors is good for everyone.
Scott Dahlman is executive director of Oregonians for Food and Shelter
Editor's Note: Oregon Business accepts opinion pieces on topics relevant to the state's business community. See Op-Ed submission guidelines here.
Wednesday, June 03, 2015
As part of our green workplaces story, Oregon Business checked out a community service project undertaken by Portland Youth Builders, a nonprofit alternative high school. In partnership with Whole Foods, PYB built garden boxes for a Home Forward housing site. Home Forward is a government agency that provides housing for low income residents and people with disabilities.
Friday, July 10, 2015
BY AMY MILSHTEIN
When gossip crosses the line.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Oregon's roads are crumbling, and revenues from state and local gas taxes are not sufficient to pay for improvements. We asked readers if the private sector should help fund transportation maintenance and repairs. Research partner CFM Strategic Communications conducted the poll of 366 readers in February.
"I feel private enterprises are capable of operating at a higher efficiency than state government."
"This has been used in Oregon since the mid-1800s. It is not a new financing method. This form of financing may help Oregon close its infrastructure deficit by leveraging funds."
Monday, July 13, 2015
BY SAM BLACKMAN
Storyteller-in-chief with the CEO and co-founder of Elemental Technologies.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Former Governor John Kitzhaber's resignation in February prompted some soul searching in this state about ethical behavior in industry and government.
Friday, June 05, 2015
As temperatures in Oregon creep into the 90s this weekend, Oregonians' thoughts are turning to — summer baseball.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
We asked readers to weigh in on the fossil fuel-green energy equation.
|10 Innovators in Rural Health|
|The Private 150: From Strength to Strength|
|Downtime with Debra Ringold|
|Farm in a Box|
|Flattery with Numbers|
|Preserving the Legacy|
|Best Buy will sell Apple Watch, is hoping it boosts sales|
|Biologist estimates 80% of sockeye population could die due to hot water|
|Fiat Chrysler must offer to buy back 500K Dodge Ram trucks|
|Portland kayakers protest ship owned by Shell Oil Company|
|Amazon earns $92M in profit|
|Under Armour bests Q2 earnings expectations|
|More than a hundred passengers forced to stay overnight at PDX|
One of the many reasons why businesses fail is due to the lack of attention to analytics. Sure, you can go on running your business, but mastering the science of analytics will translate into a business advantage. But what exactly are analytics and why are they so important?
Court experience helps legal firm anticipate potential problems for clients and prevent expensive litigation.
When Garmin AT needed to consolidate operations for its 550 employees, it scanned its entire corporate map for possible sites.
Professional and Continuing Education (PACE) and the College of Business at Oregon State University is offering “Business Analytics for Competitive Advantage”, a two-day intensive workshop.
34 spots for food, 17 places to sip, and 7 sites to choose a brew beckon visitors.
A look back at the shifting sands of Portland’s growth and development.