|| Print ||
|Friday, April 05, 2013|
BY TOM COX | BUSINESS TIPS CONTRIBUTOR
Strategic execution requires that you stop putting people first (in the wrong way). Profit must come first.
I will pause while you gasp in horror.
If you “put people first” in the wrong way, you’re harming them, yourself, the rest of the team, and the other stakeholders — including investors and customers.
The only way to make an honest profit is by giving to paying customers something they value more than money. If you stop doing that, your firm collapses and everybody loses their job.
Without profits, you have no business, and thus no jobs for anybody. Profit is oxygen. It’s life blood.
Yet bosses frequently fail to respect profits and mistakenly “put people first” in absolutely the wrong way.
I’m seeing this right now. Here’s the story.
Jack and Jill
Jack is a successful people-person. He’s bad with details, and great with clients. Jack has an assistant that is just as scatterbrained as he is. Jill is super smart, very pleasant and personable, and has “loads of potential.” And Jill has no follow-through, is not detail oriented, and lacks drive.
Jack is the boss — his strengths need to be accentuated, and his weak areas need to be bolstered by hiring staff who are strong where he is weak. That’s just Drucker 101. (When Jill becomes a boss, the exact same thing will be true for her.)
So not only has Jack created a dynamic where both he and his assistant are weak in the same area — guaranteeing that Jack’s customers and peers and boss will experience him as disorganized — Jack has also created a situation that’s unfair to Jill.
Consider Jill’s growth. If Jill is going to improve her organizational skills, it would likely be under a boss who was good at it. That’s not Jack.
And if Jill were going to make best use of her smarts, pleasantness and personality, it would be as a counterbalance to a boss who was weak in one or more of those areas.
And, Jill’s career will be better enhanced by being successful, not by struggling as she is now.
This makes Jack totally the wrong boss for Jill, and Jill the wrong assistant for Jack.
But Jack refuses to change anything. ”Oh, she’s got so much potential,” he’ll tell me. And, they’re very much alike, which Jack enjoys. And thus, the dysfunction continues.
How “Putting People First” Fails
“Putting people first” has at least three dysfunctional incarnations:
The key reason these approaches fail is, they don’t focus on the one-two punch of real Strategy Execution:
So your first priority must be executing your strategy for creating value for customers. Without that, your business is not sustainable.
Yet I constantly see people — including smart CEOs and business owners — who having once hired someone, will put that person ahead of the company’s mission.
In fact such bosses may be putting their own personal discomfort ahead of the firm. It’s hard to admit you hired the wrong person, or to admit that someone failed and should be reassigned or let go.
Drucker says in The Effective Executive:
I know this because I’ve done it. When I found myself trying to pick my business strategies based on what my then-assistant could and couldn’t handle, rather than on what my skills could deliver and what clients most needed, I finally realized I was hurting everybody involved. And I was doing it because I didn’t want to have a difficult conversation.
(Yes, in the short term, you may need to pursue the work that your people can deliver well. Long term, you need to grow or recruit people to deliver the work your ideal clients most need.)
Here’s how to tell if you’re putting people first in the wrong way:
If you said “yes” to two or more of these, you have a systemic problem. Seek help. For everybody’s sake.
Tom Cox is a Portland area consultant and executive coach. He helps leaders exceed their business aspirations.
Friday, July 10, 2015
BY JOE CORTRIGHT
The false promise of economic impact statements.
Thursday, July 09, 2015
The sweltering weather didn't keep the crowds away. Although the numbers were down slightly from last year, the Oregon Food Bank raised $850,636 to fight hunger. About 80,000 people attended despite temperatures in the upper 90s.
Thursday, August 06, 2015
Car and ride sharing services have taken urban areas by storm. Low-income and suburban communities are left at the curb.
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
BY KIM MOORE
A conversation with Chris Maples, president of the Oregon Institute of Technology.
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
BY GARY THILL | PHOTOS BY JASON E. KAPLAN
A storied institution climbs down from the ivory tower.
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Which of the following would be most effective in reducing the cost of operating a public university in Oregon?
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
BY JACOB PALMER
Live, Work, Play wit the CEO of Ruby Receptionists.
|Child care challenge|
|Is there life beyond Reed?|
|Back to School|
|Apple's next new product event: Sept. 9|
|Washington meat producer recalls pork|
|Ninkasi grows to NY|
|Eco challenges facing Oregon|
|Adidas produces special shoe for upcoming Timbers/Sounders match|
|Intel invests $60M in drone company|
|Congestion should be expected|
Yesterday, a divided National Labor Relations Board dropped another hammer on the employer community. In a long-awaited and much debated move, the Board jettisoned the decades old standard for determining when two independent businesses should be considered joint employers of an individual worker for collective bargaining purposes.
Transforming the culture of Oregon’s educational leadership.
The Board dismissed a petition related to efforts to unionize the Northwestern University football team.
Oregon Sick Leave is here, and changes to the federal white-collar worker regulations are on the way. This workshop will prepare you for both. We invite you to participate in an interactive discussion on how to start planning now for the future impact on your operations and finances.
Presented by OEN + CENTRL + YESpdx.
This Roundtable will cover numerous issues under the employer "shared responsibility" rules of the Affordable Care Act, including how to track the "full-time" status of variable-hour employees, temporary or seasonal employees, and employees who experience a change in status or a break in service. Additionally, we will provide a brief overview of Code sections 6055 and 6056, which require most mid-sized and large employers to submit their first information reports to the IRS in early 2016 regarding the health insurance coverage being offered to employees. We invite you to participate in an interactive discussion on how to prepare for the future impact of the shared responsibility rules on your operations and finances.