Could legalizing same-sex marriage boost Oregon's economy?

| Print |  Email
The Latest
Wednesday, January 16, 2013

BY EMMA HALL

01.16.13 Blog GayMarriageThe Williams Institute of UCLA Law recently released a report estimating the economic impact in the three newest states to approve gay marriage — Maine, Maryland and Washington. Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex unions in 2004. From May 2004 to September 2008, the state had a $111 million boost from gay marriage legalization, according to an earlier report by The Williams Institute.

The report predicts that wedding spending in the next three years in those states could generate over $166 million. Washington same-sex couples make up an $88 million chunk of that, with a $57 million boost expected in the first year alone. The impact would be felt especially at wedding and tourism-related businesses.

The Williams Institute findings are based on 2010 U.S. Census data and Washington's average wedding spending. It also assumes that half of Washington's existing same-sex couples will marry in three years, based on the rate of marriage after same-sex marriage was legalized in Massachusetts. Estimates don't include the myriad of out-of-state same-sex couples that might travel to Washington to get married when they don't have the opportunity in their home states—including couples from Oregon.

The effects of same-sex marriage legalization are already being felt in Washington, even though it has only been a little over a month since the law went into effect on Dec. 6, 2012. Over 130 gay couples were married at Seattle City Hall on the first day alone.

Though Washington's same-sex marriage legalization is still in infant stages, the biggest boost to the economy is expected in the first year. By the end of 2013 it should become clearer if Oregon voters will follow suit.

Basic Rights Oregon will be collecting signatures for a 2014 measure this summer. The organization needs to collect 116,284 signatures to qualify for the ballot. Basic Rights Oregon decided not to pursue a ballot measure in 2012, because the "timing wasn't right." Oregon faces a harder fight than Washington, which voted for a statute change. To legalize same-sex marriage, Oregon voters would have to overturn a constitutional ban that was previously voted in—the 2004 constitutional amendment Measure 36 that prohibits gay marriage. Although nine states currently allow same-sex marriage, Oregon would be the first to overturn a constitutional ban if Basic Rights Oregon is successful.

Currently, Oregon does have domestic partnerships (approved by the Legislature in 2007), but supporters want full equal rights, and think that 2014 could be the time as more politicans rally behind the cause. President Obama is the first sitting president to declare his support for gay marriage and there are many openly gay prominent figures in government  (such as House Speaker Tina Kotek, the first openly lesbian house speaker). However, some supporters think 2014 would be a bad time to bring the controversial choice to voters, as non-presidential elections generally have lower voter turnout, as well as a lower turnout of young, liberal voters.

As Oregon's economy remains stagnant with unemployment at 8.4%, it remains to be seen if the $88 million spending boost in Washington will sway some of the 57% of Oregon voters who opposed gay marriage in 2004.

Emma Hall is web editor for Oregon Business.

 

Comments   

 
Guest
0 #1 Gay marriageGuest 2013-01-17 03:33:03
Come on Oregon, stick with the rest of the progressive world!
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
0 #2 Yeah, sure:Guest 2013-02-05 00:52:33
But really it's unneccessary, all they have to do is target small conservative buisness folk and point their dirty little fingers, and lots of money will flow via the law firms......

Myself, I make a practice of supporting the businesses they pick out to rant about and bully!
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
+2 #3 Short term benefit - long term costGuest 2013-02-15 20:38:57
We don't have enough time under our belts here in the US to make a determination about the long-term financial consequences of same-sex "marriage" but we can look to Europe where it has been legal for several years and see that the long-term impact on children and the economy is actually quite negative. When marriage is re-defined it becomes less important of an institution across the board and more children are born out of wedlock, which empirical evidence shows ends up costing the tax-payers and society a great deal more. Children do best with their married biological parents - meaning one man and one woman - committed for life. Economically speaking, we would do well as society to reduce the divorce rate and increase the fatherhood rate to boost economic standing. We pay on average $30,000 per divorce and unwed birth. Stable, healthy families lead to stable, healthy economies.
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
-1 #4 Don't Blame 8 percent of the population for your straight glutonous ways like you did in Rome.Guest 2013-02-18 13:39:23
Gay marriage should be enacted because it is the right thing to do and is a human right, not because it may be lucrative.
I don't think it will financially matter much, the United States is financially screwed thanks to years of irresponsible consolidation and banking scams done mostly by straight upper class irresponsible bankers and leaders that have cost our society more in promoting their own family values then a single mother or gay man ever has.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

More Articles

City announces plans for Portland summer-league baseball team

News
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
IMG 3888BY JACOB PALMER | OB DIGITAL NEWS EDITOR

Baseball is returning to Portland and city officials are hoping economic opportunity comes with it.


Read more...

Short Shrift:The threat of just-in-time scheduling

May 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015
BY AMY MILSHTEIN

Companies can benefit when they use software to meet staffing requirements and address employees' family and life commitments.


Read more...

Epitaph for a Boondoggle

April 2015
Friday, March 27, 2015
BY JOE CORTRIGHT

The CRC is a cautionary tale about how we plan for, finance and invest in transportation infrastructure.


Read more...

Beneath the Surface

May 2015
Thursday, April 23, 2015
0515-goodhacker01 250pxwBY LINDA BAKER

On April 1 I attended a forum at the University of Portland on the sharing economy. The event featured panelists from Lyft and Airbnb, as well as Portland Mayor Charlie Hales. Asked about the impact of tech-driven sharing economy services. Hales said the new business models are reshaping the landscape. “But,” he added, “I don’t pretend to understand how a lot of this [technology] works.” 


Read more...

Knight Cancer Challenge No Biotech Dream

May 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015
BY JOE CORTRIGHT

The Knight challenge is an important instance of philanthropy. But we should not assume it will magically transform OHSU into a business- and job-spinning engine for the local economy.


Read more...

Downtime with the director of Barley's Angels

May 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015
BY JACOB PALMER

Live, Work, Play with Christine Jump.


Read more...

Downtime with the executive director of Greater Portland Inc.

April 2015
Thursday, March 26, 2015

Janet LaBar, Executive director, Greater Portland Inc.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS