Home The Latest Could legalizing same-sex marriage boost Oregon's economy?

Could legalizing same-sex marriage boost Oregon's economy?

| Print |  Email
The Latest
Wednesday, January 16, 2013

BY EMMA HALL

01.16.13 Blog GayMarriageThe Williams Institute of UCLA Law recently released a report estimating the economic impact in the three newest states to approve gay marriage — Maine, Maryland and Washington. Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex unions in 2004. From May 2004 to September 2008, the state had a $111 million boost from gay marriage legalization, according to an earlier report by The Williams Institute.

The report predicts that wedding spending in the next three years in those states could generate over $166 million. Washington same-sex couples make up an $88 million chunk of that, with a $57 million boost expected in the first year alone. The impact would be felt especially at wedding and tourism-related businesses.

The Williams Institute findings are based on 2010 U.S. Census data and Washington's average wedding spending. It also assumes that half of Washington's existing same-sex couples will marry in three years, based on the rate of marriage after same-sex marriage was legalized in Massachusetts. Estimates don't include the myriad of out-of-state same-sex couples that might travel to Washington to get married when they don't have the opportunity in their home states—including couples from Oregon.

The effects of same-sex marriage legalization are already being felt in Washington, even though it has only been a little over a month since the law went into effect on Dec. 6, 2012. Over 130 gay couples were married at Seattle City Hall on the first day alone.

Though Washington's same-sex marriage legalization is still in infant stages, the biggest boost to the economy is expected in the first year. By the end of 2013 it should become clearer if Oregon voters will follow suit.

Basic Rights Oregon will be collecting signatures for a 2014 measure this summer. The organization needs to collect 116,284 signatures to qualify for the ballot. Basic Rights Oregon decided not to pursue a ballot measure in 2012, because the "timing wasn't right." Oregon faces a harder fight than Washington, which voted for a statute change. To legalize same-sex marriage, Oregon voters would have to overturn a constitutional ban that was previously voted in—the 2004 constitutional amendment Measure 36 that prohibits gay marriage. Although nine states currently allow same-sex marriage, Oregon would be the first to overturn a constitutional ban if Basic Rights Oregon is successful.

Currently, Oregon does have domestic partnerships (approved by the Legislature in 2007), but supporters want full equal rights, and think that 2014 could be the time as more politicans rally behind the cause. President Obama is the first sitting president to declare his support for gay marriage and there are many openly gay prominent figures in government  (such as House Speaker Tina Kotek, the first openly lesbian house speaker). However, some supporters think 2014 would be a bad time to bring the controversial choice to voters, as non-presidential elections generally have lower voter turnout, as well as a lower turnout of young, liberal voters.

As Oregon's economy remains stagnant with unemployment at 8.4%, it remains to be seen if the $88 million spending boost in Washington will sway some of the 57% of Oregon voters who opposed gay marriage in 2004.

Emma Hall is web editor for Oregon Business.

 

Comments   

 
Guest
0 #1 Gay marriageGuest 2013-01-17 03:33:03
Come on Oregon, stick with the rest of the progressive world!
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
0 #2 Yeah, sure:Guest 2013-02-05 00:52:33
But really it's unneccessary, all they have to do is target small conservative buisness folk and point their dirty little fingers, and lots of money will flow via the law firms......

Myself, I make a practice of supporting the businesses they pick out to rant about and bully!
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
+2 #3 Short term benefit - long term costGuest 2013-02-15 20:38:57
We don't have enough time under our belts here in the US to make a determination about the long-term financial consequences of same-sex "marriage" but we can look to Europe where it has been legal for several years and see that the long-term impact on children and the economy is actually quite negative. When marriage is re-defined it becomes less important of an institution across the board and more children are born out of wedlock, which empirical evidence shows ends up costing the tax-payers and society a great deal more. Children do best with their married biological parents - meaning one man and one woman - committed for life. Economically speaking, we would do well as society to reduce the divorce rate and increase the fatherhood rate to boost economic standing. We pay on average $30,000 per divorce and unwed birth. Stable, healthy families lead to stable, healthy economies.
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
Guest
-1 #4 Don't Blame 8 percent of the population for your straight glutonous ways like you did in Rome.Guest 2013-02-18 13:39:23
Gay marriage should be enacted because it is the right thing to do and is a human right, not because it may be lucrative.
I don't think it will financially matter much, the United States is financially screwed thanks to years of irresponsible consolidation and banking scams done mostly by straight upper class irresponsible bankers and leaders that have cost our society more in promoting their own family values then a single mother or gay man ever has.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

More Articles

The short list: 5 companies making a mint off kale

The Latest
Thursday, November 20, 2014
kale-thumbnailBY OB STAFF

Farmers, grocery stores and food processors cash in on kale.


Read more...

Growing a mobility cluster

News
Friday, October 31, 2014
0414 bikes bd2f6052BY LINDA BAKER | OB EDITOR

Why are there so few transportation startups in Portland?  The city’s leadership in bike, transit and pedestrian transportation has been well-documented.  But that was then — when government and nonprofits paved the way for a new, less auto centric way of life.


Read more...

The Bookseller

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BY AMY MILSHTEIN

Everyone knows college is expensive, but a look at the numbers brings that into sharp — and painful — focus.


Read more...

Shuffling the Deck

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BY JON BELL

Oregon tribes still bet on casinos.


Read more...

Shifting Ground

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BY JOE ROJAS-BURKE

Bans on genetically modified crops create uncertainty for farmers.


Read more...

Healthcare pullback

News
Thursday, November 20, 2014
112014-boehnercare-thumbBY JASON NORRIS | OB CONTRIBUTOR

Each month for Oregon Business, we assess factors that are shaping current capital market activity—and what they mean to investors. Here we take a look at two major developments regarding possible rollbacks of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).


Read more...

Reimagining education to solve Oregon's student debt and underemployment problems

News
Thursday, November 13, 2014
carsonstudentdept-thumbBY RYAN CARSON | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

How do we skill up our future technology workforce in a smart way to take advantage of these high-paying jobs? The answer shouldn’t focus only on helping people get a bachelor’s degree.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS