Sponsored by Energy Trust

Foreclosures shifting to courts

| Print |  Email
Linda Baker
Thursday, September 13, 2012


09.13.12 Blog ForeclosureFor those who track the foreclosure market, the hot property today is the number of judicial foreclosures in Oregon. “Everybody wants to know,” says Fernando Velez, consumer information specialist with the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services.  Why the sudden interest?  Until recently, the vast majority of foreclosures in Oregon have been non-judicial foreclosures, which take place out of court and are generally considered to be a cheaper and more streamlined option than going through the courts.  

But two changes to the foreclosure process have triggered what John Helmick, CEO of Gorilla Capital, a company that buys distressed homes, describes as a "paradigm shift": a decline in the number of non-judicial foreclosures and increase in court procedures. The first development is a July 18th Oregon Court of Appeals decision, ruling that non-judicial foreclosures listing MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems Inc.) as a beneficiary violated the state’s recording law for non-judicial foreclosures. (MERS was created by the industry as a way to package and sell loans to investors.) The second development is an Oregon law that went into effect on July 11, requiring banks to offer mediation in a non-judicial foreclosure.     

The MERS ruling and mediation requirement will shift foreclosures to the courts, agree banks, lawyers and consumer advocates.  Under the MERS ruling, lenders now have to go back and figure out how to record a loan's history, a difficult task since most mortgage loans change ownership multiple times.  Even if lenders can comply with the recording law, they will still be faced with the mediation process in the new bill, said William Larkins, a Portland attorney who represents lenders. "That is driving trends."

There is less agreement as to whether shifting foreclosures to the courts will have a positive or negative impact on homeowners facing foreclosure.

About those numbers. According to data provided by Gorilla, in August, 122 non-judicial notices of defaults were filed in the  20 Oregon counties (including Multnomah) that the company tracks. These numbers are down 71% from July, the month in which the mediation law went into effect.

David Ambrose, a Portland real estate attorney, tracks filings in Deschutes and Jackson counties.  After July 11, the number of non-judicial foreclosures declined to about one every two week period, Ambrose said. At the same time, "the number of judicial filings skyrocketed." During a single two-week period, said Ambrose, there were about 43 judicial filings in Deschutes and Jackson counties.

So what's the takeaway? Responses to the changes in Oregon's foreclosure process depend on the interest at stake.

Department of Justice spokesperson Jeff Manning says the uptick in judicial filings will have “real implications for the judicial system. We have a civil system already under some strain, then you start adding thousands of judicial foreclosures. The courts don’t need additional burden.”  On the other hand, notes Manning,  early evidence suggests lenders are winning default judgments in the judicial foreclosures. If homeowners don't respond to the complaint, Manning said, the impact on the courts will be minimal.

Intended as consumer protections, the MERS and mediation rulings could be harmful to homeowners, some foreclosure experts say. Judicial foreclosures make it easier for lenders to seek a "deficiency judgment" against non-resident homeowners. A deficiency judgement is the difference between the value of the mortage note and value of property foreclosed. The owner of the judgment can garnish the wages and accounts and lien property of the former homeowner, said Helmick. Thus, by modifying the foreclosure statutes, thousands of Oregonians are now subject to judgment liens rather than having the underwater portion of their mortgage forgiven, he said.

Consumer advocates disagree. A shift to the courts "is no cause for concern for anyone who represents homeowners," said Angela Martin, executive director of Economic Fairness, Oregon.  The judicial process affords homeowners greater rights and protections, she said. Many housing assistance organizations will pay lawyers fees for homeowners facing a court ordered process. Judicial foreclosures also provide homeowners with a "right of redemption," in which homeowners have 180 days after the property is sold in a foreclosure sale to redeem the property from the purchaser.  There is no right of redemption in a non-judicial foreclosure.

As lawyers work through the implications of the new ruling and law, one thing seems clear. The  Oregon developments add to the barrage of legal challenges to the processes lenders use to foreclose homes. Those legal challenges are adding to the uncertainty surounding the nation's foreclosure crisis — and an overall decline in the number of foreclosures. 

"At the end of the day, what all this is leading to is more short sales," said Ambrose.

Larkins isn't so sure.

"It's not good for anybody to have this much of uncertainty in the system," he said. " And that’s what we have right now.  There’s so much uncertainty in non-judicials right now that judicials look like a very certain path for a lender. If a lender has the note and the borrower is in default there is very little doubt about outcome for lender. The lender will win."

The non-judicial concept was put into law in Oregon in 1959, following more than 100 years of judicial foreclosures, said Larkins. "Now it's back to the old alternative, which no one would have expected three years ago."

Linda Baker is managing editor of Oregon Business.

Clarification: This article has been amended to distinguish between resident and non-resident homeowners in the judicial foreclosure process. 




0 #1 RE: Foreclosures shifting to courtsGuest 2012-09-13 19:32:44
Angela Martin clearly does not understand what happens in a court foreclosure, given her comments. It is usually worse and more expensive for a consumer. And it will increase the number of vacant homes in our communities, because they usually cannot be sold until the expiration of the redemption period.
Quote | Report to administrator
+1 #2 FriendGuest 2012-09-13 20:30:19

I would agree with you you stated, except for one thing. A Homeowner is not a consumer when it comes to mortgage loan. A consumer purchases "goods" or "services", but loan.
Goods and services is where the homeowner loses because gooods and services are provided to the MERS members, not a homeowner. The tangible homeowner note secured by the security instrument is what the secured creitor should have, but a MERS member cannot fit paper Note and Security Instrument into the computer unless they scan the tangible medium. The MERS Members reisters and/or transfers an eNote [which does not have a U.S Law to support the eNote; see 15 usc 7003] which is a transferable record. that transferable is considerd goods and MERS provides the services.
With that said, figure out how the paper security instrument can follow the eelectronic Note lawfully.
Scanning the paper Note is creating a image of the paper note, but that would be electronic. How can a Bank combine an electronic note with a paper security instrument? they cannot.
Quote | Report to administrator
0 #3 clouded titleGuest 2012-12-29 00:12:14
Yes,but how do they fix the clouded title?
Quote | Report to administrator
0 #4 GuestGuest 2012-12-29 01:14:22
Depends on whom "they" are. If the "person" claiming title cannot not prove how they are a "real party in interest", and according to most state laws, they are not entitled. Don't know where you are, but look into "quite title" if you want to know more. However, there may be a different option other than quite title. I find looking a boring arse case law, especially those who've lost in attempts to "quite title", "wrongful foreclosure", "DTPA", "TILA", "RESPA", etc. because the courts usually let them know where they misapplied there arguments. Being a pro se is not a fun journey, but it does make you a better person of understanding. look for trilliondollarf ubar.
Quote | Report to administrator

More Articles

Corner Office: Timothy Mitchell

January-Powerbook 2015
Saturday, December 13, 2014

A look-in on the life of Norris & Stevens' president.


Woman of Steel

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Tamara Lundgren tackles the challenges—without getting trampled.


Editor's Letter: Power Play

January-Powerbook 2015
Thursday, December 11, 2014

There’s a fascinating article in the December issue of the Harvard Business Review about a profound power shift taking place in business and society. It’s a long read, but the gist revolves around the tension between “old power” and “new power” as a driver of transformation. Here’s an excerpt:

Old power works like a currency. It is held by few. Once gained, it is jealously guarded, and the powerful have a substantial store of it to spend. It is closed, inaccessible, and leader-driven. It downloads, and it captures.

New power operates differently, like a current. It is made by many. It is open, participatory, and peer-driven. It uploads, and it distributes. Like water or electricity, it’s most forceful when it surges. The goal with new power is not to hoard it but to channel it.

The authors, Henry Timms and Jeremy Heimans, don’t necessarily favor one form of power over another but merely outline how power is transitioning, and how companies can take advantage of these changes to strengthen their positions in the marketplace. 

Our Powerbook issue might be viewed as a case study in the new-power transition. This annual book of lists provides information on leading businesses, nonprofits and universities in the state. Most of the featured companies are entrenched power players now pursuing more flexible and less hierarchical approaches to doing business. Law firms, for example, are adopting new technologies and fee structures to make legal services more accessible and affordable.

This month we also take a look at a controversial new U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring public companies to disclose the median pay of workers, as well as the ratio between CEO and median-worker pay. 

Part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law, the rule will compel public companies to be more open about employee compensation, with the assumption that greater transparency will improve corporate performance and, perhaps, help address one of the major challenges of our time: income inequality.

New power is not only about strategy and tactics, the Harvard Business Review authors say. “The ultimate questions are ethical. The big question is whether new power can genuinely serve the common good and confront society’s most intractable problems.”

That sounds like a call to arms. Or a New Year’s resolution. Old power or new, the goals are the same: to be a force for positive change in the world. Happy 2015!

— Linda


Behind the curtain: What students should know about accreditation and rankings

Contributed Blogs
Thursday, December 04, 2014
120414-edurating-thumbBY DEBRA RINGOLD | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

How important are institutional and/or program evaluations provided by third parties in selecting a college or university program?


Two Sides of the Coin

Contributed Blogs
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
22 twosidesBY JASON NORRIS

Historically, when the leaves fall, so do the markets. This year, earnings, Europe, energy and Ebola have in common? Beyond alliteration, they are four factors that the investors are pointing to for this year’s seasonal volatility.


The short list: 5 hot coffee shops for entrepreneurs

Contributed Blogs
Friday, November 14, 2014


Oregon entrepreneurs reveal their favorite caffeine hangouts.


Fly Zone

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014

The black soldier fly’s larvae are among the most ravenous and least picky eaters on earth.

Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02