Sponsored by Oregon Business

Smart phones vs. prepaid plans

| Print |  Email
High Five
Monday, June 28, 2010

Consumers now consider cell phones to be a necessity rather than a luxury, even when it comes to smart phones such as iPhones or Blackberries.

The recession has created a fiercely competitive market between smart phones and prepaid plans.

One group of mobile users is signing contracts and shelling out more in monthly service fees to upgrade to iPhones, Black­berries and other smart phones — essentially pocket-size computers that enable their owners to transmit e-mails or access the Web while they’re on the go.

A different group is bargain hunting, increasingly choosing prepaid, no-contract plans, offered by companies such as Cricket or Sprint’s Virgin and Boost brands.

“We believe that consumers who would in previous years have purchased ‘standard’ midrange devices either opted for less-expensive handsets or moved up the range to get more features for their money,” said Carolina Milanesi, a mobile devices analyst with Gartner Group.

Read more at The Register Guard.

{biztweet}smart phone{/biztweet}



0 #1 Prepaid is betterSimonC 2010-06-30 02:20:33
I've tried the smartphone thing. Really, I have. Got the fancy gadget, played with all the fancy features, used it for all kinds of uses. For two weeks. Then I was bored with the phone and used it as a phone only (plus sending texts obviously) for the rest of the two-year contract. Paid darn near a hundred bucks a month for it!

After that I switched to NET10 prepaid and pay like $20 a month now. And the network coverage is actually better!
Quote | Report to administrator
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02