|| Print ||
|Friday, August 24, 2012|
BY TOM COX
Jake is a terrific member of his fast-growing company’s senior leadership team. His boss Darcy, the owner, is a sweet lady with great personal skills. That complements Jake’s tough, task-oriented, ramrod approach. Odds are good Darcy will one day sell the firm to Jake… if she doesn't fire him first.
Such odd-couple pairings are common in highly effective organizations. Common also are the tensions between them.
The effective CEO recruits for strength where she herself is weak, in order to round out a diverse team. However it’s not enough to let leaders play to their natural strengths — letting the people-person build relationships while the letting the task-oriented person drive for results. Each leader needs to encapsulate “just enough” of both capabilities.
In practice, that means getting better at what Pete Friedes (in “The 2R Manager”) calls your “less dominant” management style. You need to have enough of a relationship with another person that you have some traction with them — they actually care about your opinion and want to make you happy — and you have to be able to clearly ask for what you want, without apology, and insist on quality — including requiring that people do work over if needed.
Jake’s problem is that nobody goes the extra mile for him, and he doesn't grow the people who work for him. He seems to have a lot of the ideas on his team… because others tend not to volunteer their thoughts.
All of that leaves him unable to take on new work, and he often finds himself taking over a project that’s not going the way he wants. Jake works later than he wants to. At this rate, he’ll either burn himself out, or start to resent his team and drive them away, increasing costly turnover.
Permission to Relate
The dirty secret here is that relating — at least some of the time — is actually more effective over the long term than being a task-oriented demanding boss.
A lot of demanders (or “Requirers” in Pete Friedes’ language) won’t give themselves permission to spend time relating. Bosses like Jake mistakenly believe that relating is
A waste of time
People work harder for a boss they like and who they believe genuinely cares about them
People bring their ideas to the table when they believe they’ll be listened to, making the team more effective
People speak up when they feel safe doing so, thus catching problems earlier, saving time and money
As Mark Horstman of manager-tools.com would say, “If you don’t have time to build relationships with your people, then I want the team next to you, because I’ll invest the time, and my team will out-perform yours. In a year, it’ll be like night and day.”
Two Skills: Asking and Listening
Jake doesn’t realize that, when he interrupts, he’s sending two messages:
Your input is not valuable
The opposite is true of listening. When you listen, you send two very different messages:
Your input is valuable
What Jake should do is take a lesson from chapter 6 of Goulston’s book — “Be More Interested than Interesting” — and learn to ask questions and listen to the answers.
Behaviors of Deep Listening
Face the person squarely and look closely at their facial expressions and body language.
The good news is, within 4-6 weeks of steady application of some new Relating behaviors, Jake will see a huge increase in performance by his team. He’ll learn how to motivate them, because they’ll tell him what they care about, because he stopped to ask and listen. And once he shows that he cares, they’ll walk through fire for him.
Once he’s tasted that success, Jake will never go back. Nor will you. (You can receive my free 1-page coaching tip sheet, “Work Sheet for Over-Requiring Managers” by clicking here.)
Tom Cox is a Beaverton consultant, author and speaker. He coaches CEOs on how to boost performance by building workplace trust. Email comments to
|10 Innovators in Rural Health|
|The Private 150: From Strength to Strength|
|Flattery with Numbers|
|Preserving the Legacy|
|Downtime with Debra Ringold|
|Farm in a Box|
|Boeing chairman threatens to relocate|
|Economy's growth disappoints analysts|
|Portland fireworks hotline overloaded by call volume|
|Rolling Stone magazine sued by UVA frat brothers|
|'Kayaktivists' hang from St. Johns Bridge to protest Shell Oil ship|
|Legal pot sales to start Oct. 1 in Oregon|
|Best Buy will sell Apple Watch, is hoping it boosts sales|
One of the many reasons why businesses fail is due to the lack of attention to analytics. Sure, you can go on running your business, but mastering the science of analytics will translate into a business advantage. But what exactly are analytics and why are they so important?
Court experience helps legal firm anticipate potential problems for clients and prevent expensive litigation.
When Garmin AT needed to consolidate operations for its 550 employees, it scanned its entire corporate map for possible sites.
Professional and Continuing Education (PACE) and the College of Business at Oregon State University is offering “Business Analytics for Competitive Advantage”, a two-day intensive workshop.
34 spots for food, 17 places to sip, and 7 sites to choose a brew beckon visitors.
A look back at the shifting sands of Portland’s growth and development.