|| Print ||
|Thursday, April 05, 2012|
BY TOM COX
Some of our biggest problems are self-inflicted. One of the worst is a mental mistake called “judging others by ourselves.”
Young children do this all time. If they like lollipops, they just assume everybody likes lollipops.
Young managers do this too. (I’ve taken to calling this childish error the “lollipop mistake.”)
The “lollipop mistake” caused Joshua to sabotage his relationship with a key client. It also caused Sandra to mismanage one of her people. Fortunately, there is a simple mental trick you can use to protect yourself from this mistake.
When Joshua was delivering a project for a key client, the client, Chris, started getting upset. Joshua was “going dark” on the client – letting hours or days pass without updating him on how the project was progressing. After all, since Joshua knew everything was fine, then the client should (somehow) know it too.
Then on the crucial Friday Joshua came on site, brought Chris into a room with all the subcontractors, and proceeded to do what he later described to me as “an awesome job” of dividing up the work, walking all the subs through their project tasks, and then sent them off with their marching orders.
Anybody with Joshua’s knowledge would have been impressed, and Joshua delivered his part of the work and went away convinced Chris was impressed and pleased. That night the client, Chris, sent several irate emails that went to the wrong mailbox – Chris had misspelled Joshua’s email address.
Joshua, obviously, didn’t reply, and on Monday Chris called him on the phone to fire him.
Afterward, Joshua wanted to be validated and vindicated.
“I did a great job! Anybody could see that,” he exclaimed. “And it wasn’t my fault I didn’t reply to emails that were sent to the wrong address. He can’t blame me for that.”
That’s not true. The client can blame you for failures to communicate, and if the client thinks something is true, then it is true unless you can demonstrate the opposite.
Joshua fully expected Chris to watch a meeting and reach the exact same conclusion Joshua reached – that the project was going well and everything was under control.
That is false, foolish and wrong.
The only person who reaches conclusions like you, is you.
The only person with your way of looking at the world is you.
The reality of projects is you have a positive obligation to inform people of what’s going on.
The “lollipop mistake” showed up for Sandra when she tried to manage how much work one of her line workers, Pat, was given.
Pat is on salary. She always stays late at the office, and never seems to get things done as quickly as others. Sandra just assumed Pat was slow – a not unreasonable guess – and started taking work away from her so that Pat would “catch up.”
This never happened.
No matter how much work Sandra took away, Pat was always staying after hours, and made little progress at turning around work more quickly.
It turns out Pat had a terrible marriage and hated going home. She also felt a sense of comfort from having a certain amount of work lined up ahead of her, and would grow anxious if it seemed she was “running out of work.” This caused her to slow down and become excessively perfectionist about the little work she had to do.
Sandra’s biggest mistake was assuming that Pat wanted to leave “on time” — Sandra assumed it because that’s what Sandra wanted, and of course (as the “lollipop mistake” says): if I want something, everyone must want it too.
Stop hiding behind that Lollipop - that's for suckers. Have a lollipop.
(The second mistake was taking work away. As Mark Hostman and Michael Auzenne of Manager-Tools.Com put it, you can and should expect your people to get more efficient over time. When someone is struggling, have them write down all their tasks, and tell them to take a first shot at prioritizing those tasks. More on that another day.)
You can overcome the “lollipop mistake” in just a few minutes by changing your thinking. Joshua and Sandra need to reverse their reasoning.
The “lollipop mistake” consists of three mental steps:
Reverse this. The trick is to be accepting and inquisitive:
Remember that other people are motivated, not by your values, but by their values.
Listen. Respect other people’s behavior and decisions as being illustrations of their values. Once you stop judging and condemning, and start respecting and listening, you’ll be far more effective.
|The 100 Best Companies to Work For in Oregon|
|Help Wanted: Poached Jobs aids restaurateurs |
|How Oregon will survive the loss of Hanjin|
|On the Brink|
|Thy neighbor's house|
|How a Utah-based essential oils company cornered the Oregon market|
|McDonalds pledges to stop selling chicken raised with antibiotics|
|Uber invests in mapping software, setting up contention with Google|
|Bill Gates leads Forbes' richest people list|
|Oil continues to gain on supply risks|
|With AmEx out, Costco turns to Visa, Citi|
|California gas prices spike|
|SeaWorld aims to alter marketing strategy|
Generations of students and graduates have been plagued by the question: What is my true calling in life? Four alumni from Corban University’s Hoff School of Business who graduated in different decades say the school helped them find the answer by giving them a practical, well-rounded education.
It’s happening whether anyone’s ready or not. Businesses here in Oregon and across the U.S. are already experiencing the effects of the largest generational shift in recent history, and these changing tides will impact every level of the workplace — from a company’s executive leadership to its cultural core.
Success stories spotlight meaningful career opportunities in Oregon's diverse and lucrative tourism industry.
Parkinson's Resources of Oregon (PRO) is pleased to announce, long standing Intel manager, Kelly Sweeney has joined the agency’s Board of Directors as a member at large.
Local businesses interested in offering retail items, food and beverage, or passenger services at Portland International Airport are invited to attend one of two meetings on March 17.
The Firm was recognized for the strength of its case matters during 2014, including precedents set or verdicts with notable high dollar amounts at stake.