|| Print ||
|Friday, March 21, 2014|
TOM COX | OB BLOGGER
Here’s how to help your staff solve their own problems.
At a recent talk to HR Directors, I asked if they saw leaders trying to solve every problem, instead of delegating to and empowering staff.
Every head nodded. Every single one.
Mine too. In fact, I see leaders (at every level) clustering at the extremes — they either take over problems, or simply abandon staff to “figure it out” for themselves (properly known as “abdication”).
How to Delegate Problem-Solving
Delegation lies between these extremes. Most leaders haven’t been taught how to delegate. Here’s the process I teach. You should make sure every manager and supervisor who reports to you is following this method — or a better one.
First, get your arms around the problem.
A problem usually arrives in the form of a complaint. This can be “we don’t like the coffee” or “Joe showed up for work drunk” or “we lack money to finish the expansion that would earn us more money.”
And there are two common emotional reactions leaders have to a complaint, depending on whether they’re in Relating mode or Requiring mode.
Relaters want the complaint to go away by fixing the problem or making the complainer feel better. They’ll say things like “let me help you” or “I’ll fix that for you.”
Requirers want to crush the complainer, or make them be quiet. They’ll say things like “don’t whine” or “don’t bring me problems, bring me solutions.” (Which is stupid, but common. I used to say it, and cringe now to recall it.)
You want to be in a third mode – the Empowering mode.
When you are in Empowering mode, you treat reports of problems with gentle, open-minded skepticism. You will want to say things like:
“Tell me more about the problem.”
Example: a manager tells you “the staff doesn’t like the coffee.”
Second, Move from Complaint to Problem Statement
Stay in Empowering mode. Shift the other person from merely complaining, to a more constructive mindset.
It is not enough to tell the employee to “bring me solutions.”
Ask questions like:
“If this were fixed, what would we see?”
Example: “How can we get coffee that most people mostly like, while staying within budget, and without spending a lot of time on it?”
Remember to put a fence around this problem-solving effort. You don’t want your subordinate spending 100 hours solving a $10 problem. So remember to ask this as well:
“How much time and money do you think we should spend on solving this problem?”
Get agreement on an amount, and add that as a budget of time and money for this mini project.
Third, Start to Generate Solutions.
In this phase, for a larger issue, you can use it as an opportunity to help your subordinate build their own independent network of contacts in your organization.
In the prior step you had them list out the people they need to involve in the conversation building toward the solution. Now you edit it.
Then have your subordinate contact them.
Warning: set boundaries. Sometimes subordinates who are quality-conscious will devote 20 times more work effort into a problem than is justified. Don’t let that sneak up on you. (You don’t want a simple get-better-coffee issue to turn into a multi-departmental standing committee.)
Ask “How much clock time and how many dollars is it worth to us to resolve this?” Listen closely to their answer, then give them your own opinion. This way you help them start to think in more strategic terms.
Now your subordinate can contact the relevant people and work with them — within limits — to generate some candidate solutions.
Example: “The coffee issue will be addressed by the people who drink coffee, who sign up to participate. I’ll leave a sign-up sheet on a clipboard at the coffee machine. We’ll work on it no more than 20 minutes at a time, once a week.”
Think a tiny problem like this doesn’t deserve a project charter? Maybe — but how will your people get good at big projects if they don’t practice on small ones?
Fourth, Agree on Criteria.
Ask your subordinate to answer:
What makes a good solution good?
Fifth, Rank the Solutions.
In this phase, rate and rank the solutions using the criteria. This should be as easy as it sounds.
By starting well, you’ll find you’ve both saved yourself time and made your subordinate more effective at working with you on problems.
Tom Cox blogs on leadership for Oregon Business.
|The Private 150: Bigger But Leaner|
|The Perfect Food|
|Powerlist: Staffing Firms|
|Taxis Uber Alles?|
|Google tests drone deliveries|
|Abercrombie to remove logos from most clothing|
|FBI investigates JPMorgan 'cyber-attack'|
|GoPro launches camera dog harnesses|
|Snapchat now worth $10B|
|Tomatoes may lower prostate cancer risk|
|WHO: Ban e-cigarette use indoors|
Vigilant enters a New Year with a new president.
How George Fox has become one of Oregon's largest private universities.
Forest Grove sees growth in the burgeoning food and beverage scene.
Lane Powell Shareholder William T. Patton has been appointed to the board of directors for Cascade AIDS Project, an organization that provides educational services and outreach to thousands of Oregonians living with HIV/AIDS.
Fifty-one Lane Powell lawyers were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® (Best Lawyers) 2015; of those selected, 23 lawyers are from the Firm’s office in Portland, Oregon.
Barran Liebman is proud to announce that Andrew Schpak, a Partner of the firm, has been named Chair of the American Bar Association’s Young Lawyers Division for the 2014-2015 bar year.