<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Eugene considers new fees</title>
		<description>Discuss Eugene considers new fees</description>
		<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/must-reads/8778-eugene-considers-new-fees</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.oregonbusiness.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/8778?device=xhtml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Eugene 'Fees'</title>
			<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/must-reads/8778-eugene-considers-new-fees#comment-3102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What the Eugene Fees article doesn't seem to provide is the REASON for the FEES. The reason is average worker cost OVER $100,00. The logic is don't outsource functions the city doesn't run well, almost everything, raise taxes. It doesn't make any difference what it is called the solution is 'raise taxes'. I wonder why this state is always behind in economic activity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/must-reads/8778-eugene-considers-new-fees#comment-3102</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
