<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Land-use laws prevent towns from expanding</title>
		<description>Discuss Land-use laws prevent towns from expanding</description>
		<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/high-five/4122-land-use-regulations-prevent-oregon-towns-from-expanding</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.oregonbusiness.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/4122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>UGB expansion</title>
			<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/high-five/4122-land-use-regulations-prevent-oregon-towns-from-expanding#comment-861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not sure that 4-5 years to expand a UGB is all that terrible. The land will never be rural again. UGB fights and journalism about them always seem to focus on an elderly disenfranchised widow. A landowner and a law firm with a good story aren't usually operating with unalloyed motive. An energetic reporter would also analyze options that don't require expansion and why they aren't being considered.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Gene Dieken</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/high-five/4122-land-use-regulations-prevent-oregon-towns-from-expanding#comment-861</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
