<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>A different nonprofit strategy</title>
		<description>Discuss A different nonprofit strategy</description>
		<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/70-october-2009/2352-a-different-nonprofit-strategy?device=iphone</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.oregonbusiness.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/2352?device=xhtml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>A different nonprofit strategy</title>
			<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/70-october-2009/2352-a-different-nonprofit-strategy?device=iphone#comment-451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Pixie Project deserves no recognition. The director treats potential adopters with suspicion and makes snap judgments about them. They take dogs in from rural areas who may not have even seen the big city, and force them to walk on MLK Blvd. She even admits that the dogs are scared and nervous when taken out for walks. She treats volunteers like they have no brain and gives preferential treatments to her friends. She claims to be doing the dogs a favor, but instead of trying to find homes she is too busy trying to find as much publicity for herself (not the animals) as possible. As a former volunteer, this place is highly discouraging.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/70-october-2009/2352-a-different-nonprofit-strategy?device=iphone#comment-451</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
