<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>A tale of two subsidies</title>
		<description>Discuss A tale of two subsidies</description>
		<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/58-may-2009/1657-a-tale-of-two-subsidies</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.oregonbusiness.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/1657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Regulations In Tax-Free Exemptions and Strict Implementations</title>
			<link>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/58-may-2009/1657-a-tale-of-two-subsidies#comment-458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am for tax-free exemptions but if this creates temptations of favoritism, corruption and manipulation, then regulations and eliminating tax-exempt private-activit y bonds should be given priority by our legislators. Free markets needs regulations established and implemented and there should be a balance to keep it working for everyone. As a young investor, i would still invest in municipal bonds after all, there's no other investments which offers tax-free incentives.For me at 32, I would rather take risks but ensure I have the right investment tool to better monitor and manage my bond portfolios even in multiple accounts. To get a clear picture of what an investment tool could offer investors, visit this site for investors by investors http://www.bondview.com/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Shane C</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.oregonbusiness.com/articles/58-may-2009/1657-a-tale-of-two-subsidies#comment-458</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
