|| Print ||
|Friday, December 20, 2013|
BY TOM COX | BUSINESS TIPS CONTRIBUTOR
What if being in chaos was optional?
What if crisis, or chaos, or “firefighting,” or feeling behind schedule, behind the press of constantly emerging problems, could be stopped?
It can. It’s simple. It’s not easy. Here are your three steps to stop fighting fires — and getting control, confidence, and clarity.
“Firefighting syndrome” is a chronic problem in American businesses. As Roger Bohn and Ramchandran Jaikumar put it in their 2000 paper “Firefighting by Knowledge Workers,” firms exhibit “firefighting syndrome” when they are chronically doing three or more of these:
I frequently see all six. I also exhibit several.
Here’s how I get myself out of this, and get my clients out — and how you can get out too. The three steps are:
Pareto to the Rescue
Start with the humble log. Seriously. Writing down your crises and fires — as they occur — will take you barely any time, and provides amazing value.
In each case everybody insisted that “there was no pattern” and the crises were all astonishing visitations from higher planes — neither controllable nor truly understandable.
This mindset makes crises become chronic.
In reality, 80% of your crises will be caused by 20% of your causes. (This is the Pareto Principle or the “80-20 Rule” — frequently, 80% of effects are driven by 20% of causes.) You’ll never spot them until you patiently, fire by fire, disaster by disaster, crisis after crisis, log them for later analysis.
A Better Mindset
Your mindset is crucial for overcoming firefighting syndrome.
If you resist logging your fires, you have a mindset that is helping foster firefighting.
The more you believe that fires can neither be predicted nor prevented, the more true you make it — because you will overlook chances to predict and prevent them.
Even if you only have 5% influence on fires, devote 95% focus on your 5% contribution.
And anybody at any level of an organization can keep a log and do some analysis. All it takes is a brain, and a pen and paper.
If it’s worth complaining about, it’s worth logging. The process of logging fires creates emotional distance and gives you the detachment you’ll need for later stages.
Oh, and you cannot, must not, be looking for blame. Blame and shame will create fear — nobody will be willing to be fully candid when they’re afraid.
That’s why the First Rule of Quality is “Drive out fear.” Look only for what went wrong — never for who was wrong.
Log and Analyze
Once you have a log, you can start to analyze.
Why are shipments going out late? Why are projects delayed? Why are our customers returning products? Why are former employees posting negative reviews on glass door?
This is the tedious part of the exercise. For each entry in the log, for each instance of a crisis, take the time to dig in and look for a cause, and the cause behind the cause. Don’t look for patterns yet. Let each entry be unique.
And be transparent. If you’re contributing, admit it.
Find the Pattern
One cause doesn’t make a pattern. Look for groups of causes that are similar.
For one client, we found that 84% of crises were caused by the same four things.
For another client, over 80% were caused by just two things.
As the military saying goes, “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.”
As it turns out, there aren’t all that many reasons why shipments go out late, or projects get delayed, or customers return products. And thanks to Pareto, you will find that 80% of returned orders are for a small subset of products, and 80% of late shipments are caused by a handful of reasons, and so on.
Use the “Five Whys” of the Toyota Way. To use a classic example:
Beware of “magical thinking” during the Five Whys process — you’re looking for causes that are realistic.
Root cause analysis is a great group activity — it allows people to stand shoulder to shoulder, looking at the problem – instead of standing nose to nose, blaming each other. As a leader, be the first to volunteer your own errors during root cause analysis.
In the above example, if you are in charge of training new developers, you should volunteer that “my group failed to train the developer.” If you were the boss didn’t insist that your new developer get training, you should volunteer that “I didn’t require him to take quality training before pushing code into production.”
I promise you, other people in the room are already thinking about your role in creating the crisis. When you say it before they do, you reduce tension, you show yourself to have strong character, and you inspire them to admit to their own contribution to creating the crisis.
This helps you as a leader to Drive Out Fear.
Get Up Stream
Everything is a system — some just aren’t documented. Your firefighting is ultimately part of a system. Once the pattern has emerged, you can identify the systemic causes, stop fighting fires, and create long term solutions.
Your next step should be, insert a fix at each level of the Five Whys analysis.
Using the same example:
Notice there is no step labelled “fire the bad person” — you should assume there are no bad people, only systems that need improvement.
Got a problem you can’t analyze, or a log of fires with no clear pattern? Contact me and I’ll lend you a hand.
Tom Cox is a Beaverton consultant, author and speaker. He coaches CEOs on how to boost performance by building workplace trust.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
BY KIM MOORE
Robin Anderson, dean of the Pamplin School of Business, University of Portland: "You need people who are comfortable leading in ambiguity."
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Power Lunch at the Imperial.
Saturday, December 13, 2014
Checking in with the managing director of Arnerich Massena.
Friday, December 12, 2014
BY LINDA BAKER
A conversation with Oregon state economist Josh Lehner.
Thursday, December 11, 2014
BY JACOB PALMER | OB DIGITAL NEWS EDITOR
We ask business and nonprofit leaders how they survive the season.
Sunday, December 07, 2014
BY LINDA BAKER
On Friday, Uber switched on an app — and with one push of the button torpedoed Portland’s famed public process.
Thursday, December 04, 2014
BY DEBRA RINGOLD | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
How important are institutional and/or program evaluations provided by third parties in selecting a college or university program?
Real Time - Oregon Business
Tweets by @OregonBusiness
|The Carbon Calculus|
|Will Medford Ever Be Cool?|
|Raising the Stakes|
|The Human Factor|
|Which Way to Chinatown?|
|Commercial jet demand bolsters Boeing |
|Apple augments record quarter by shorting memory|
|Microsoft, Caterpillar woes lead Dow decrease|
|US consumer confidence continues to rise|
|Radical party's election win in Greece creates shockwaves|
|Flights canceled en masse as east coast preps for blizzard|
|West Coast port talks resume after rallies|
Is your business ready to join us in the call for action? This opening panel includes Oregon businesses who will discuss why they signed the Oregon Climate Declaration, the investments they are making to reduce carbon emissions, and how their actions are affecting their companies.
Get ready for two days of special events produced with the EPA, Portland Timbers and ISOS before and after the GoGreen Conference on October 16.
hubbub health uses behavior change science to rethink wellness programs.
In Ashland, a public-private partnership results in online resources to help diversify the local economy.
How sports tourism is driving economic growth and making cities across Oregon a better place to live.
If you have given a former employee access to your company’s electronic information by virtue of assigning a desktop or laptop computer and you suspect he or she of having taken electronically stored data, there are several steps to follow to preserve electronic forensic evidence from spoliation.
The official launch will be Jan. 14.
In a switch on the traditional trade show, representatives from UO departments and local and state agencies will host tables to connect with businesses and vendors. The fourth Reverse Vendor Fair will take place Wednesday, Feb. 25, in Eugene.