Oregon gets peanuts from the Pentagon

| Print |  Email
Archives - August 2007
Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Is defense in retreat?

PacStar3500.jpg
The PacStar 3500 — essentially a portable office with a ruggedized laptop and satellite modem — was designed by a Portland  company for remote military teams.

STATEWIDE — Despite the efforts of a regional business coalition to increase Pentagon contracts awarded in Oregon, last year the state fell to its lowest ranking in defense spending per state in 10 years.

Military contracts fell to $562 million in 2006, a decline from $589 million the year before. At the same time, Oregon dropped from 40th to 43rd place when compared to federal spending in other states.

However, those behind the Pacific North-west Defense Coalition say Oregon’s low profile in the world of military spending, while less than ideal, isn’t necessarily a bad thing. And as the nation’s military presence in Iraq presumably decreases in the coming years, the state could benefit as the Department of Defense shifts its attention from resupplying the armed forces to developing new technology.

Air crews wear Flightcom’s E-13 ANR headsets to reduce the low-frequency noises that induce fatigue and impede communication.
FlightcomE13.jpg
CrimsonTrace.jpg
Wilsonville-based Crimson Trace’s handgun laser sights are used by all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces.

In 2005, about 20 defense companies in Oregon and southern Washington formed the Pacific Northwest Defense Coalition (PNDC). In April the group hired its first full-time executive director, Brice Barrett.

Focusing on big-picture numbers is important, he says, but not at the expense of what’s actually being accomplished. “We don’t want to get lost. We don’t want to set that [national comparison] as a performance benchmark. Don’t get me wrong, [increasing Oregon’s ranking] is a strategic goal, but trying to manage that number can very dangerous.”

Compared to states with comparable populations — for example, Connecticut ($7.7 billion in contracts in 2006) or Oklahoma ($2 billion in 2006) — Oregon has never seen much defense-industry cash. In the mid 1990s the state’s annual total was sometimes as low as $130,000 for all businesses combined.

Despite Oregon’s national reputation as a blue-leaning state — think former Sen. Mark Hatfield’s anti-Vietnam War stance or President George H. W. Bush’s “Little Beirut” nickname for Portland — a lack of contracts probably has little to do with politics, says Bill Lunch, chair of Oregon State University’s political science department.

The reasons are simpler: no major military bases. No marquee defense companies. No skilled workforce to attract new defense companies. “One thing builds on another,” Lunch says. “In terms of defense spending, Oregon has always been a bit of a backwater.”

With the invasion of Iraq came a little boom in the backwater. In the leadup to the war, the state’s annual defense contracts total exploded past $400 million. It peaked at $589 million in 2005.

In the last two years the PNDC has also grown; it boasts 80 member companies. Officials at those companies laud the coalition for its success in helping businesses learn the intricacies of the contract process. Winning a defense contract is sometimes the easiest part, says Barbara Keepes, division manager at Portland’s Flightcom, which makes aviation headsets. A network of businesses that can answer questions and explain paperwork can be invaluable.

DefenseFundingTable.gif When it comes to the value of defense con-tracts, Barrett has some rosy figures. He estimates defense-related companies employ more than 2,000 Oregonians, who earn more than $122 million a year. But if Oregon businesses increase the amount in contracts they get to $1.4 billion a year, the workforce would jump to 5,000, wages to $300 million and income tax to $16 million.

Is that even possible? Or does the 2006 drop in contracts portend a return to 1990s-era figures?

There’s one thing that may prevent a continued downward slide: Many Oregon companies make products with uses that extend beyond wartime. Consider Wilsonville’s FLIR, which makes infrared imaging systems; Portland’s HemCon, which makes specialty medical bandages; and Clackamas’ Oregon Iron Works, which among other types of work, has a defense contract to work on a wave-energy project.

Bill Sundermeier, senior vice president at FLIR, put it most succinctly. When the military is not at war, he says, its emphasis shifts from re-supplying troops to creating innovative technology.

Chandra Brown, vice president of Oregon Iron Works and vice chair of PNDC, points out that the Department of Defense is looking for sustainable energy sources. “Look at wave and wind energy. That will be an area where Oregon and the Pacific Northwest can play a bigger role in future acquisitions and the greening of the military,” she says.

At the end of the Cold War, the defense in-dustry in California took a major hit. Barrett remembers the fallout; he oversaw the man-agement of defense contracts as a project manager in the Air Force’s space program. He sees parallels with the war in Iraq.

“At the end of the war there will be a whole different kind of spending,” he says. “We’re not building the bombs or the guns or the tanks. Therefore we can provide a whole different kind of product.”

— Abraham Hyatt


Have an opinion? E-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

More Articles

Corner Office: Sheree Arntson

January-Powerbook 2015
Saturday, December 13, 2014

Checking in with the managing director of Arnerich Massena.


Read more...

Reimagining education to solve Oregon's student debt and underemployment problems

News
Thursday, November 13, 2014
carsonstudentdept-thumbBY RYAN CARSON | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

How do we skill up our future technology workforce in a smart way to take advantage of these high-paying jobs? The answer shouldn’t focus only on helping people get a bachelor’s degree.


Read more...

Editor's Letter: Power Play

January-Powerbook 2015
Thursday, December 11, 2014

There’s a fascinating article in the December issue of the Harvard Business Review about a profound power shift taking place in business and society. It’s a long read, but the gist revolves around the tension between “old power” and “new power” as a driver of transformation. Here’s an excerpt:

Old power works like a currency. It is held by few. Once gained, it is jealously guarded, and the powerful have a substantial store of it to spend. It is closed, inaccessible, and leader-driven. It downloads, and it captures.

New power operates differently, like a current. It is made by many. It is open, participatory, and peer-driven. It uploads, and it distributes. Like water or electricity, it’s most forceful when it surges. The goal with new power is not to hoard it but to channel it.

The authors, Henry Timms and Jeremy Heimans, don’t necessarily favor one form of power over another but merely outline how power is transitioning, and how companies can take advantage of these changes to strengthen their positions in the marketplace. 

Our Powerbook issue might be viewed as a case study in the new-power transition. This annual book of lists provides information on leading businesses, nonprofits and universities in the state. Most of the featured companies are entrenched power players now pursuing more flexible and less hierarchical approaches to doing business. Law firms, for example, are adopting new technologies and fee structures to make legal services more accessible and affordable.

This month we also take a look at a controversial new U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring public companies to disclose the median pay of workers, as well as the ratio between CEO and median-worker pay. 

Part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law, the rule will compel public companies to be more open about employee compensation, with the assumption that greater transparency will improve corporate performance and, perhaps, help address one of the major challenges of our time: income inequality.

New power is not only about strategy and tactics, the Harvard Business Review authors say. “The ultimate questions are ethical. The big question is whether new power can genuinely serve the common good and confront society’s most intractable problems.”

That sounds like a call to arms. Or a New Year’s resolution. Old power or new, the goals are the same: to be a force for positive change in the world. Happy 2015!

— Linda


Read more...

Shifting Ground

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BY JOE ROJAS-BURKE

Bans on genetically modified crops create uncertainty for farmers.


Read more...

Leading with the right brain

News
Tuesday, December 09, 2014
120914-manderson-thumbBY LINDA BAKER

On the eve of the Portland Ad Federation's Rosey Awards, Matt Anderson, CEO of Struck, talks about the transition from creative director to CEO, the Portland talent pool and whether data is the new black in the creative services sector.


Read more...

I Know How You Feel

November/December 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
BY JESSICA RIDGWAY

Most smartphones come equipped with speech recognition systems like Siri or Cortana that are capable of understanding the human voice and putting words into actions. But what if smartphones could do more? What if smartphones could register feeling?


Read more...

Crowdfunding 2.0

News
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
120214-crowdfund-thumbBY LINDA BAKER

A conversation with attorney Erich Merrill about the latest way to raise money from large groups of people.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS