Oregon land use law turns 40

| Print |  Email
Articles - September 2013
Monday, August 19, 2013
0913 LandFutures 02
Oregon's land-use laws have limited sprawling housing developments while preserving farmland.

Whether one supports or is skeptical of Oregon’s land-use system, it remains unique. “It’s truly radical in the national picture,” says David Oates, author of the 2006 book City Limits: Walking Portland’s Boundary. The best evidence, of course, is how Portland differs substantially from virtually any other large American city west of the Mississippi. It’s what enticed Oates to move here two decades ago from Los Angeles. “The contrast” between dense, pedestrian-friendly Portland and the sprawling car culture of Southern California, he says, “is in front of your eyes every single day.”

Oates cites a wave of urban-infill projects that have turned vacant lots and destitute inner-city neighborhoods into a metropolis the New York Times and countless other media — not to mention thousands of educated creative-class workers for a range of industries — can’t get enough of.

Rural land benefits just as much, supporters argue. “When you look at the health and vitality of cities in Oregon and its farmland, from Ashland to Portland, Senate Bill 100 had a lot to do with that,” says Ryan Deckert, president of the Oregon Business Association. “A well-planned city you can enjoy and appreciate makes a huge difference to a corporation. We see both sides of it, be it the health of a vineyard or a burgeoning software industry.”

Deckert cites a recent private dinner in Portland with the American head of a major foreign automaker who was scouting the state for future development. “They like Oregon because we seem to have thought ahead.”

The thinking ahead got its start in the 1960s, when Gov. McCall led a growing bipartisan and urban-rural consensus against what he called “sagebrush subdivisions” and “coastal condo-mania.” Senate Bill 100 was passed on May 29, 1973, after a long public-outreach process, culminating in the creation of the state Land Conservation and Development Commission to oversee creation of local urban-growth boundaries. And once ballot measures calling for repeal of Senate Bill 100 were defeated in 1976 and 1978, every Oregon municipality was required to have comprehensive plans and growth boundaries in place by 1986.

The desire for middle ground struck again in 2000, when disgruntled private-property owners, many of whom had seen their land devalued and its development restricted, struck back again. Voters approved Ballot Measure 7, calling for landowners to be compensated when government regulation caused devaluation. The Oregon Supreme Court overturned the measure on a constitutional technicality, but in 2004, voters approved Ballot Measure 37, which not only called for property owners to receive compensation when a land-use regulation was enacted after their purchase, but also allowed local governments to instead roll back zoning regulations.

Then came a compromise that seems to have held. As local governments became overwhelmed with Measure 37 claims, the legislature referred Measure 49 to voters with successful passage in 2007. Measure 49 terminated Measure 37 claims but provided an allowance of up to three additional housing units per claim.

“I think 49 has settled [those problems],” says David Hunnicutt, president of Oregonians In Action, the property-rights group that spearheaded Measure 37. The larger problem, he says, is a one-size-fits-all approach that favors urban needs over rural ones. “The idea of Senate Bill 100 was we were going to create a state system and a state agency to oversee local planning, but the bulk of the planning would be done at the local level, so counties would have flexibility,” he says. “But that really hasn’t come to pass. In a state as big and diverse as Oregon, planning and zoning needs really should be driven at the local level. You have to understand, despite 40 years of centralized planning, we’re still the only state that’s doing it this way.”

Hunnicutt cites Oregon’s northern neighbor, Washington, where local jurisdictions have a greater say in their own planning, and the smallest rural towns can opt out altogether. “Out of the 39 counties, 10 aren’t subject to Washington’s statewide land-use laws, basically because there isn’t any growth to manage,” Hunnicutt explains. “We could take a page from that and allow some of our struggling, rural, nongrowing counties the opportunity to exercise some creativity, and try to kick-start their economy without the weight of 19 state land-use planning goals weighing over their heads.”



 

More Articles

Transportation Fairness Alliance holds demonstration in Pioneer Square

The Latest
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
IMG 3367BY JACOB PALMER | OB DIGITAL NEWS EDITOR

Portland's cab companies urged city hall for consideration as officials weigh new rules for Uber and other ridesharing companies.


Read more...

Editor's Letter: Tortoise and the Hare

February 2015
Monday, January 26, 2015

The day after this issue goes to press, the city of Medford will host its annual business conference. The event features Minoli Ratnatunga, co-author of the Milken Institute’s annual “Best-Performing Cities” report. Preliminary data suggests that Medford is likely to retain its No. 1 ranking among best-performing small cities for having a higher concentration of high-tech firms than the national average. 


Read more...

4 married couples who work together

The Latest
Thursday, January 22, 2015
IMG 0020BY JACOB PALMER | OB DIGITAL NEWS EDITOR

They say maintaining a healthy marriage takes work. So does running a business with your spouse.


Read more...

Photos from the 100 Best Companies to Work For in Oregon awards celebration

The Latest
Friday, February 27, 2015
IMG 9975cneditPHOTOS BY JASON E. KAPLAN

Images from the 2015 celebration of Oregon's great workplaces.


Read more...

Green Rush: Cashing in on legal marijuana

March 2015
Friday, February 20, 2015
BY COURTNEY SHERWOOD | OB CONTRIBUTOR

Marijuana is big business in Oregon, and it’s about to get bigger.


Read more...

Meeting Facilities Perspective

March 2015
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
BY KIM MOORE | OB RESEARCH EDITOR

A conversation with Donna Earley, director of sales and marketing for the Salem Convention Center.


Read more...

The week journalism died

Linda Baker
Sunday, February 15, 2015
deadjournalismthumbBY LINDA BAKER | OB EDITOR

As the investigation against the governor moves forward, those of us in the news business should reflect on our own potential for subverting the democratic process.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS