Home Back Issues Jan/Feb 2012 The sell-out state

The sell-out state

| Print |  Email
Articles - Jan/Feb 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Article Index
The sell-out state
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5

 

0112_SelloutState_07
U.S. Bank’s history in Oregon dates back to 1891. It's owned by U.S. Bancorp in Minneapolis.
// Photo by Alexandra Shyshkina

In the global market, mergers and acquisitions are a regular part of the business practice, and historically venture-backed companies are built to sell. And although stories about buyouts make the headlines, there are still hundreds of Oregon-owned companies that haven’t sold. So any imbalance between big and small, between the eaters and the eaten, begs the question: So what? Does it matter if Oregon-owned companies are acquired by out-of-state firms? What kind of impact does this have on Oregon business and community?

The answers are complex, and among business leaders, there isn’t necessarily agreement. From an individual business perspective, a focus on exit strategies “is harmful,” says Raghu Raghavan, CEO of Act-On Software, a Beaverton-based provider of marketing automation software that last summer became one of Oregon’s acquirers, buying the assets of California-based Marketbright, also a marketing automation provider. “If you’re thinking about being acquired, you don’t optimize the company for growth,” says Raghavan, pointing to Nike as an example. "A company getting to that scale is not thinking about exits, they’re thinking about markets.” Act-On has grown from eight to 58 employees in two years and is on a path to triple revenue in 2012.

If thinking about getting out too soon is harmful, so is an exclusive focus on starting up. “There’s a love affair with starting new companies that can be very damaging,” says Andrew Nelson, a professor of management at the University of Oregon. “We need more attention to the very difficult stage of actually growing them.”

Nelson cited as an example the popularity of Startup Weekend Portland. “What happens after that weekend?” he asks. That love affair with the new, the small and the not necessarily directed extends to the state level, Nelson suggests. Unlike Seattle or San Diego with their vibrant biotech industries, “Oregon has been reticent to place bets in certain sectors,” Nelson says, preferring instead “to be all things to all people.”

Such diverse offerings may explain why Portland is such a buyer’s market. Danone acquired YoCream because the company was a “center of excellence,” with “expertise” in frozen products, unchartered territory for the French conglomerate, says spokesman Michael Neuwirth. The acquisition also reflected Danone’s “glocal” approach: “global in scale, local in business, tied to the earth and land in which we work,” says Neuwirth.

There’s no data showing what happens to Oregon companies after they’ve been sold, whether as a group they get bigger and better, or smaller and disappear. According to Tim McCabe, director of Business Oregon, the impact is wide-ranging. He cites companies such as Hermiston-based Snack Alliance and PV Powered in Bend, firms that were acquired but then continued to grow in Oregon.

Then there are financially struggling companies such as Jeld-Wen, “where outside purchase kept the business going and employing hundreds here in Oregon,” says McCabe. Tazo Tea falls into yet a third category, companies “that are purchased and do leave the state down the line,” he says.

For McCabe, the acquisition dynamic is almost irrelevant. “The bottom line is we work to keep companies and jobs growing in Oregon, whether it’s an Oregon-owned firm or not,” he says. Sean Robbins, CEO of Greater Portland Inc., echoes that view. Eighty percent of job growth comes from existing companies, he says. But in the global M&A marketplace, and in a city and state that isn’t a hub of private equity or venture capital, the critical factor isn’t so much maintaining local ownership but identifying opportunities to grow jobs even in the case of an acquisition — an approach he says is part of Greater Portland Inc.’s 2012 Work Plan.

Others take a less sanguine approach to the loss of some of Oregon’s most iconic companies, with even those who sold expressing some ambivalence. “A lot of the values that we created are still there, but it’s not the same family-owned company,” says Gun Denhart of Hanna Andersson. “It’s corporate culture focused on the bottom line.”

Dave Chen is more explicit about the downside of becoming a corporate colony. “When something is acquired, it becomes a division or unit, you lose that company’s contribution to the community and their investment in the community. The impact is terrible.”



 

Comments   

 
Juvenal Goldstein
0 #1 DiasporaJuvenal Goldstein 2012-01-23 10:46:40
Oregon is a hostile business environment and Portland is a branch office town.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

More Articles

OB Video: Oregon MESA

News
Thursday, June 26, 2014

ThumbOregon Business hosts an informal roundtable discussion about the Oregon MESA (Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement) program.


Read more...

South Waterfront's revenge

News
Thursday, July 24, 2014
MoodyAveBY LINDA BAKER | OB EDITOR

Remember the naysayers?  Those who called the South Waterfront aerial tram a boondoggle?  Those who rejoiced at the massive sell off of luxury condos at the John Ross and Atwater Place?


Read more...

Blips and trends in the housing market

News
Thursday, June 26, 2014
062614 thumb realestateBY ERIC FRUTS | OB BLOGGER

Last year, the housing market in Oregon—and the U.S. as a whole—was blasting off. The Case-Shiller index of home prices ended the year 13% higher than at the beginning of the year. But, was last year a blip, or a trend?


Read more...

Poll Wrap-Up

News
Friday, August 15, 2014

2014 NewPoll-report-newsletterthumbIn this week's poll, we asked readers: "Who should pay for the troubled Cover Oregon website?" Here are the results.


Read more...

Oversight? Or gaming the system?

News
Monday, July 14, 2014
AmazonBY VIVIAN MCINERNY | OB BLOGGER

Some people think Amazon’s winking eye logo is starting to look like a hoodwink.


Read more...

Updated: Disrupting innovation

News
Tuesday, July 08, 2014
070814 thumb disputive-innovationBY LINDA BAKER  | OB EDITOR

The New Yorker recently published a sharply worded critique of “disruptive innovation,” one of the most widely cited theories in the business world today. The article raises questions about the descriptive value of disruption and innovation  — whether the terms are mere buzzwords or actually explain today's extraordinarily complex and fast changing business environment. 

Update: We caught up with Portland's Thomas Thurston, who shared his data driven take on the disruption controversy.


Read more...

Trends in business succession

News
Thursday, July 03, 2014
TrendsBY TED AUSTIN & MIKE BAELE | GUEST CONTRIBUTORS

The Office of Economic Analysis announced that Oregon is currently enjoying the strongest job growth since 2006. While this resurgence has been welcome, the lingering effects of the 2008 “Great Recession” continues to affect Oregon businesses, especially with regard to estate planning and business succession.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS