|| Print ||
|Articles - December 2011|
|Tuesday, November 15, 2011|
Page 3 of 3
Small-business and consumer advocates raise their own concerns about affordability and accessibility. Outreach to rural and minority communities will be a challenge, says Gonzalez. He would also like to see the small-business tax credit expand to businesses with employees making up to $75,000. “We hope no business is priced out because they want to attract good employees,” he says.
Back to the million-dollar question. Will the exchange help control or drive down the cost of health insurance? That has yet to happen in Massachusetts or in Utah, where small-business insurance inside the exchange is actually more expensive than outside. As for Oregon — in October, the consumer advocacy group OSPIRG released a nationwide study of exchange initiatives, ranking the Oregon law a B minus. One weak point, says Laura Etherton, OSPIRG’s health policy advocate, is “the legislative language failed to direct the exchange to lower costs.”
The exchange will eventually have an impact on cost, just not directly, King and others respond. That’s in part because because federal law requires identical plans sold inside and outside the exchange to have identical premiums. Also, as King points out, the Oregon Insurance Division must approve all health-insurance rates and increases. As a result, Oregon already boasts “the most robust rate approval process in the nation,” according to King. What’s more, Oregon isn’t Kansas, which is one of several states that has only one small-business carrier. About seven carriers serve Oregon’s small group market.
In short, since Oregon is already home to a competitive yet heavily regulated insurance market, the exchange on its own is unlikely to bring prices down. Why isn’t that a deal killer? Contrary to popular opinion, says King, the reason insurance rates are increasing 5%-10% a year isn’t because carriers “are taking the money and pocketing it.” Instead, he says, “service delivery reforms” are the key to controlling health-care expenses.
Unlike Massachusetts and Utah, Oregon’s exchange is not unfolding “in a vacuum… but is part of a whole chain of things happening to address quality and cost,” says Christofferson. One is the development of a new health-care model called the Coordinated Care Organization, which will integrate physical mental and dental services for more than 600,000 Oregonians under the Oregon Health Plan. Subject to approval by the Legislature, the first CCO would launch next July, with a projected savings of $239 million next biennium. Then there is the “health-engagement model,” a pilot available through the Public Employees Benefit Board, linking health coverage to behavioral changes by the participant.
As these and other new initiatives get established, King says, the goal is to fold them into the exchange, where application on a larger scale will further reduce the cost of care. In 2016, the exchange will be open to businesses with 100 employees, and in 2018 to firms with more than 100 employees.
But first things first. “Coming out of the box, with zero enrolled, we can’t negotiate,” King says. “Once I get 300,000 lives in there, we’ll have leverage to move the market.” According to Sabrina Corlette, a research professor at the Health Policy Institute and Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., Oregon is “at the vanguard of the rest of country” precisely because officials are thinking about the exchange “as a mechanism to get delivery system reforms.”
But whether enough businesses and individuals will enroll, whether federal health law will be overturned, and whether the exchange will languish as little more than a web portal, are the uncertainties clouding the future. In that regard, Chris Ellertson, president of Health Net Health Plan of Oregon Inc., speaks for both insurance carriers and purchasers when he says: “We believe there’s going to be some good that comes from the exchange. But there are a lot of question marks, a lot of things that are hard to predict.”
|The more they change, the more they stay the same|
|The 2014 List: The Top 33 Large Companies to Work, For in Oregon|
|The 2014 List: The Top 34 Medium Companies to Work, For in Oregon|
|The 2014 List: The Top 33 Small Companies to Work, For in Oregon|
|The future of money|
|Cerberus Capital to buy Safeway|
|U.S. adds 175,000 jobs|
|Bitcoin creator revealed|
|Staples closing 225 stores|
|EU to offer aid package to Ukraine|
|Daily sugar intake 'should be halved'|
|White House reveals 2015 budget|
Living in the beautiful Pacific Northwest means enjoying our wonderful surroundings, while remaining aware of the multiple types of natural disaster threats that we face: winter storms, windstorms, floods, landslides, earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis.“
Oregon State University's hospitality degree program invests in next-generation leaders.
Allowing individuals to access their own healthcare options has created more difficulty instead of making things easier. There are so many examples that illustrate why agents are more important than ever in helping businesses and individuals determine the healthcare coverage that best fits their need.
The 2014 World Trademark Review 1000 (“WTR”) recently named Lane Powell as one of the top trademark law firms in Oregon and Washington, and Lane Powell attorneys Kenneth R. Davis II, Parna A. Mehrbani, Frances M. Jagla and Paul D. Swanson as top individuals in the practice.
Capital Pacific Bank, a Portland-based community bank serving businesses, professionals and nonprofit organizations, today announced that it has earned recognition as a Certified B Corporation by B Lab, a nonprofit organization dedicated to building a community of socially responsible businesses. The bank is one of six financial institutions across the country to achieve B Corp status.
On Thursday, April 3, from 8 a.m. to noon (registration begins at 7:30 a.m.), Lane Powell will team with Oregon Business magazine for a half-day seminar titled “Best Practices For Best Employers™: How to Become One of ‘Oregon’s Best Workplaces’ Starting Today!”