Capitol Gains: it’s down to business in Salem

| Print |  Email
Thursday, March 01, 2007

OakleyBrooks.jpg By Oakley Brooks

If you’re still basking in the sunshine moment of last month when the state’s major business groups spoke with one voice to the Oregon Senate Revenue committee, it’s now safe to take off your shades. It was a historic scene, sure. But even as the Oregon Business Association, Associated Oregon Industries and high-tech lobby AeA, among others, stated their support for the suspension of the corporate “kicker” tax refund and diverting the $275 million into a reserve fund, there were some fractures and grumbling below the surface. A look at this and other harsh realities as the Legislature rolls into a third month…

CAPITAL TO BE GAINED?

As the hearings about the corporate kicker got under way, House Minority Leader Wayne Scott (R-Canby) proposed affixing capital gains and inheritance tax reductions to suspension of the corporate kicker. One of AOI’s lobbyists also voiced support for tax reductions as part of the kicker suspension. (The kicker is money “kicked back” to companies and individuals when state tax revenues are more than 2% better than projections.)

Meanwhile, OBA’s president Lynn Lundquist stated flatly “that’s not our choice” for how to write new kicker legislation.0307CapGainsChart.gif Neither Democrats in the Legislature nor Gov. Ted Kulongoski favor linking tax cuts to the kicker discussion. “The governor is more interested in talking about that as part of a broader tax reform discussion down the road,” says Kulongski spokesman Jake Weigler. “As it stands, changing the kicker would already be the most significant tax reform in 20 years.” The linked tax cuts briefly took on some intrigue because the kicker is enshrined in the state constitution and any changes would require a two-thirds vote in both bodies. Democrats holding the majority in both houses still needed some votes from Scott’s caucus to pass the suspension.

But, as of late February, Democrats had installed a safety valve to counter Republicans who might stall the kicker bill — legislation that referred the kicker diversion to voters in May. That could pass by simple majority in both chambers. And it would kick tax cuts right out of the discussion.

RENEWABLE ENERGY, RENEWED BATTLE

Last session, a bill promoting biofuels broke down after partisan bickering involving business interests. But with similar legislation moving swiftly this year, renewable energy for electricity is the issue that’s causing some division in the Oregon business community. This, even after lengthy discussions over the past year in the governor’s renewable energy working group, which included industry representatives, power companies, public interest groups and clean-energy proponents.

At a final meeting of the working group last month before the legislation was expected to start moving in the Senate, some industry groups were still worried that getting more electricity from solar, wind, geothermal and biomass — 5% by 2011; 25% by 2025 — would hurt the state’s business competitiveness. “Today, we pick the power source with the least cost and least [future] risk,” says Mike Early with Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities (ICNU), which represents some of the state’s biggest power buyers such as Boeing and Weyerhaeuser. “With this legislation, we’re not going to pick that. We don’t think mandates are appropriate and I don’t think we can support the bill as it’s currently written.”

Sen. Brad Avakian (D-Bethany), who is sponsoring the bill, counters that the cost increases will pale in comparison to long-term cost and global-warming risks associated with reliance on fossil fuels. He also planned to include a provision capping the amount utilities would be required to pay each year to meet renewable energy targets. “Everybody will see a small increase in electricity rates but it’s important to not be shortsighted about this,” Avakian says. “In time, it’s going to be more efficient and affordable.”

More than 100 Oregon business people who signed a pro-renewables petition recently circulated by energy venture capitalist Nancy Floyd agree with Avakian. But that letter revealed that there’s even some division within companies on this issue. While ICNU — which is against the bill —  counts Intel as one of its members, Intel Capital strategic investment director Stephen Saltzman signed on with Floyd’s group.

Avakian plans to put the disputes to rest sometime soon. The bill should go to the Senate floor in early March. And he says, “There should be enough votes to pass it,” and send it on to the House.


Have an opinion? E-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 

More Articles

Intrepid reporter checks out ZoomCare rebrand

The Latest
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
dentistthumbPHOTOS BY JASON E. KAPLAN

Like all good journalists, OB editorial staff typically eschew freebies. But health care costs being what they are, digital news editor Jacob Palmer couldn't resist ZoomCare's offer of a three-in-one (cleaning, exam, whitening) dental office visit, guaranteed to take no more than 57 minutes. 


Read more...

Queen of Resilience

June 2015
Friday, May 22, 2015
BY AMY MILSHTEIN

Astrid Scholz scales up sustainability.


Read more...

3 trends in the garden business

The Latest
Thursday, April 30, 2015
gardenthumbBY JACOB PALMER | DIGITAL NEWS EDITOR

Oregonians are scrambling to get their gardens in order for the summer. Here are three tips from landscaping and urban farming expert.


Read more...

The best crisis is the one you avoid

Contributed Blogs
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
crisisthumbBY GARY CONKLING | GUEST BLOGGER

Avoiding a crisis is a great way to burnish your reputation, increase brand loyalty and become a market leader.


Read more...

Downtime with the director of Barley's Angels

May 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015
BY JACOB PALMER

Live, Work, Play with Christine Jump.


Read more...

Make the Case

May 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015

10 briefcases that mean business.


Read more...

Change at the pump?

The Latest
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
001thumbBY JASON E. KAPLAN | STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

New Jersey and Oregon are the only two states in the U.S. that ban self serve gas stations. But these two holdouts may be ready to give up the game. New Jersey is considering legislation that would lift the state's ban on pumping your own gas. Oregon is considering smaller scale changes.


Read more...
Oregon Business magazinetitle-sponsored-links-02
SPONSORED LINKS