APRIL 2008: BIZ LIFE, E-TIQUETTE

{safe_alt_text}New Rules for the age of connectivity

In a world where business no longer happens during set hours and handheld mobile devices make most people instantly reachable, email correspondence seems to defy all conventions — a free-for-all of nonstop communication.

But some etiquette still exists, no matter how nebulous, says Jack Drexler, associate professor at the College of Business at Oregon State University. “The issue is always company specific,” he says. “Each should have its own norms, rules and expectations.”

For example, companies that want to convey a strong image of customer service might require that employees respond to certain types of emails within a specific time frame. But most companies never address the issue, allowing employees to use their own good judgment.

At the Empire Group, a Portland interactive agency specializing in web development, CEO Jonathon Hensley says he and his eight employees follow a loose 24-hour rule.

“It’s an unspoken window of time for getting back to the average, pressing email,” he says. “Not expecting an instantaneous response shows that a social etiquette still exists.”

In many cases, his own availability depends on the client, Hensley says. Especially when he’s out of the office.

“If I’m working with a client, they don’t want to hear that I’m not reachable,” he says. “Vacation is more about allowing myself to be on call and not sitting behind my desk.”

Daniel Wakefield Pasley, a self-employed writer and art director who lives in Portland, agrees that availability has become the norm, and he has no qualms about emailing or texting any vacationing colleague if money is on the line.

For him, the social etiquette lies with the person on the receiving end. “If you don’t want to be contacted,” he says “turn off your phone.”

And while the “off” button may send a clear, albeit temporary message, ultimately it’s worth defining the gray areas surrounding issues of availability and response times for both you and your employees.                           

LUCY BURNINGHAM


Have an opinion? E-mail feedback@oregonbusiness.com

Current Issue | SEP 08


Around the State

Season fuels fire business
It was tragic but not surprising that the nine people who died in a helicopter crash in Northern California Aug. 5 were working for a company based in Oregon.

Walker attacks ethanol law
Just weeks before Eastern Oregon gas stations will be required to sell fuel blended with ethanol, one lawmaker is already reconsidering the state’s year-old renewable fuel mandate.

Buzzing with the latest jargon
For University of Oregon professor and Economist’s View blog founder Mark Thoma the term “stagflation” is old news.

Nurses remain recession-proof
While many employees throughout Oregon are losing their jobs or worried about keeping employed, nurses are proving to be immune to the sick economy.

Graphic: Timber harvest drops in most Oregon counties

View all Around the State >




Advertisement | Advertising


Biz Life

Tactics: Brian McMenamin of McMenamins
McMenamins is an Oregon-style empire — getting big but still working hard to be quaint.

Office policy: Keep politics in its place
As the nation enters the boxing ring of presidential campaigning this fall, it’s not unusual for the jabs of political convictions to enter the workplace, too.

Tuition programs are good investments
In the ups and downs of the economic cycle retaining skilled workers remains a constant concern for businesses.

Next: Labeling food with lasers
Admit it. Peeling those little stickers off fruits and veggies is annoying.

View all Biz Life >


Lists

Deal Watch: Portland video processor raises $5.5M

The top-paid CEOs in Oregon

View all Lists >


From The Editor

Lions, tigers, bear markets
It’s been a difficult spring and summer: The economy cyclone flattened the house; the yellow brick road expansion has run out of funds.

View all Editorials >


Feedback

Most readers have made business changes to address climate change

View all Feedback >